he isn't comparing GH with SK, the swedish fanboy said Fallen will fail just because Mandic lose 16x2 against GH, so..markeloff failed after Na´Vi lose 16x3 to SK ?
2011-12-07 21:24
Please log in and sync your account with Steam to upvote.
actually he is comparing gamerhouse to SK... he was comparing the fact that mandic lost 16-2 to GH to the fact that Navi lost 16-3 to SK, which is totally different.
2011-12-08 01:13
Please log in and sync your account with Steam to upvote.
it's not different, it's two matches with two top teams(two from brazil and two from europe) on same level..both situations one team is better on nuke..he isn't comparing GH to SK, just read and think
2011-12-08 02:01
Please log in and sync your account with Steam to upvote.
GH is not a top team at all. Its definitely way worse for mandic who is supposed to be a top team to get CRUSHED by a team like GH with relatively unknown players then for Na`Vi to lose to SK. thats all i was saying... the comparison made no sense.
2011-12-08 04:31
Please log in and sync your account with Steam to upvote.
yes, GH is a top team..they're unknown 4 you because till last year they had a player under 16 y.o so they not played WCG and ESWC last years..but they played g3x cup and Acervus 2010 and manage to WIN BOTH..beating mibr, fg(mandic) and CNB(GC)
2011-12-08 04:55
Please log in and sync your account with Steam to upvote.
that would make more sense, even though Kerchnet is like 20x GH lol. You guys need to learn more english before you argue, because you truly make no sense, what he said WAS a comparison and apparently you can't fully grasp the points im making now... so its really kind of pointless for me.
2011-12-08 04:32
Please log in and sync your account with Steam to upvote.
funny to see all brazils thinking Mandic is a top team when they only played shitty south american teams and some americans lul. They dont have any tactics and would lose to a top team very clin n izi
2011-12-07 19:04
Please log in and sync your account with Steam to upvote.