I'm not basing this on wild assumptions, I've actually thought a lot about it and have cared and been disappointed about this for long... I'm assuming or kind of expecting that they don't distance themselves from the current claimed flaws of the .no scene, as they are just another team in a line of teams that have been formed lately that sadly have failed when I was hoping they would impress. I'm talking about the .no scene in general, if they don't play unserious and rather concentrate on the tournament setting with what that demands then I'm happy :D That was what I was dreading would keep them down instead of evolving, so if that's not a problem anymore it's great. I'm suspecting that yes! I actually had a list of players I meant were much better that I posted somewhere. I'll try to find the post, I can't atm. Here it is: centryz obviously, and kalsa/aNdz/ensa/firesenz. Maybe some others but I don't know atm. If the reason they aren't picked is that they won't work over time, then you've answered my question. That was what I was wondering about. In my opinon the social setting should not be too much of a problem in semiprofessional teams, you should be able to get people into the right mindset if they are serious enough. The ones I listed are the best aimers in Norway imo, so they would make a team with great individual skill. If the intention however was to make a great -team- with good teamplay I'm also quite uncertain -how- Panters will manage that/what their potential are there. Also, btw, this is just some critique from a Norwegian CS fan, I care about CS and just want to contribute to some long lost improvement, and question if something has gone wrong! :D edit: spelling