Australia qualify for TWC 2016

30-6-2016 14:48

The Australia national team have qualified for the 2016 World Championships after breezing past New Zealand 3-0 (16-1 on Dust2, 16-2 on Mirage and 16-4 on Cache).

The Oceanic spot at TWC was contested last night by the national teams of Australia and New Zealand in a single match, featuring a best-of-five format.

The match ended up being a walk in the park for Australia as they cruised to a clean 3-0 win while giving up just seven rounds across the entire series.

emagine & co qualify for TWC

The Australians fielded a total of seven players during the match, with Mohammed "⁠MoeycQ⁠" Tizani coming on for Jordan "⁠Hatz⁠" Bajic on Mirage and Cache, and Alistair "⁠aliStair⁠" Johnston replacing Nikhil "⁠NikkeZ⁠" Victor on the last map.

World Championships 2016 Oceanic QualifierBest of 5

Australia

Matchpage

30th June 2016

New Zealand

Dust2

Mirage

Cache

Australia	K - D	+/-	ADR	KAST	Rating2.0
Jordan 'Hatz' Bajic Hatz	23 - 3	+20	119.7	100.0%	2.13
Mark 'deStiny' Kagan deStiny	62 - 25	+37	113.4	89.1%	1.84
Mohammed 'MoeycQ' Tizani MoeycQ	44 - 18	+26	103.8	76.3%	1.67
Chris 'emagine' Rowlands emagine	52 - 25	+27	94.7	87.3%	1.58
Nikhil 'NikkeZ' Victor NikkeZ	26 - 15	+11	92.0	88.6%	1.50
Christopher 'dexter' Nong dexter	38 - 33	+5	88.0	78.2%	1.25
Alistair 'aliStair' Johnston aliStair	7 - 10	-3	42.1	75.0%	0.80

New Zealand	K - D	+/-	ADR	KAST	Rating2.0
Sean 'Gratisfaction' Kaiwai Gratisfaction	43 - 50	-7	78.9	65.5%	0.94
Adam 'cookie' Cook cookie	29 - 49	-20	61.4	50.9%	0.66
Egor 'LONSDALE' Baranov LONSDALE	20 - 54	-34	56.8	49.1%	0.44
Reid 'pad0s' Goldie pad0s	18 - 53	-35	48.6	49.1%	0.40
Chris 'Magnum' Wilson Magnum	19 - 49	-30	50.2	45.5%	0.40

Eight national teams will compete at TWC 2016, which will take place from October 12-16 in Belgrade, Serbia. A total of $100,000 will be up for grabs at the event, with an additional $50,000 being paid out to the teams in the form of travel and accommodation support.

nice kangooros

2016-06-30 14:48

8 replies

poorland internet LMAO

6 replies

lol internet in brazil? LMAO

2016-06-30 14:55

polak internet is very gud

2016-06-30 15:01

at least poorland has internet FeelsFavelaMan

2016-06-30 15:05

3 replies

Dont even get me started on poor internet

2016-06-30 15:23

2 replies

Why do you do this T_T

2016-06-30 16:20

What were you about to say then?

2016-06-30 17:45

ez win for kangororororos when it 7v5

2016-06-30 15:00

vac edit: this is how qualifiers for majors would look like if they were made online, fucking 2 standins? you w8 m8

2016-06-30 14:49

Standins? Each country has more than 5 players in their national team you know... have you never watched TWC? Lmao

2016-06-30 14:51

7 replies

they switched one player every map

They're allowed to do that, in the online matches they literally use different players every match. Every national team has like 10 players that are allowed to play in the matches.

2016-06-30 14:56

5 replies

i wish every game was like that, it sounds dumb, but if someone has a bad game you could replace him for one map with someone else and play the game, only it would be fucked up for major, since no one is going to make more than 5 signatures per team.

2016-06-30 14:58

4 replies

yeah because signatures>all. YOu are so stupid man. Back in the 1.6 days there was no skins, no stickers and people were still watching for a beautiful game. Now it's all for skins and bets. DIsgusting.

2016-06-30 16:09

didnt even say anything about signatures being most valuable thing, but okay, if you are butthurt kid, let it be.

2016-06-30 16:19

Well, he's right about the skins and bets tho. If a team loses on which a 12 yo skinbetting faggot has bet, they all must die from cancer. It's pathetic really.

2016-06-30 18:51

1 reply

it is awful

2016-06-30 23:13

alright

Jordan Bajic is he Serb?

oo ta qifsha nanen serbia

wow new sealand get rekterd

u just mad because kiwi cs >>> favela cs

2016-07-01 08:26

n1 Kangaroos

firdst

7v5? gg fair game lol

couldnt win 5v5 probably xdd

2016-06-30 15:25

why can't it be this easy in union????

ikr

2016-06-30 14:54

Because the strength in depth goes the other way around in union. ABs have too many good players for every position. You guys keep have weak spots, and keep playing players like Phipps. And whilst Foley on form is great, he seems really inconsistent. Although you seem you be lacking good leadership, something we seemed to have gained in Hartley.

2016-06-30 15:14

Because we don't care about Union.

2016-07-04 14:52

14th

nice

7vs5 so ez

7 vs 5 pls

rip new zealand, new NA

NA>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>NZ feelsbadman

2016-06-30 16:25

7v5 - unfair win

18-53 kek

looks like it was a good match to watch, so sad I missed it. KappaHD

closest match ever

7v5 to ez

2016-06-30 14:50

7v5?

2016-06-30 14:52

48-7 ez

Lol as if there was any competition.

7 rounds in a BO5 LUL

7vs5 in a bo5 LUL

2016-06-30 15:54

New zealand joke

2016-06-30 15:04

yup our cs scene died in 2009 this is also our B grade team still get rektd is rektd

2016-06-30 15:57

B grade getting rekt by C grade aussies.

2016-06-30 21:00

expected

2016-06-30 15:06

7v5 not fair

2016-06-30 15:10

nice one astralis

2016-06-30 15:16

7v5 ? sounds fair jokes asaid, who cares?

2016-06-30 15:18

flam3z needs a kick in the head fielding the lineup he did.

2016-06-30 15:20

hltv found it too difficult to show the difference in both flags so they made the nz flag as bright as possible EDIT: So judging by the results, two matches later and we'd have a NZ victory?

2016-06-30 15:26

Whoa 7vs5? Server didn't have auto team balance setting I guess.

2016-06-30 15:36

i think swapping 2 players mid-game can be a really good decision, if the players trust the call. it's win or lose, if the standins havent played that much with the squad, its rip. but if they play good, they will bring very nice variation.

2016-06-30 15:51