Community reacts: Valve scraps MRQs

Players, coaches, talent, and org executives have shared their thoughts on Valve's controversial decision to eliminate Major qualifiers.

Earlier on Wednesday, StarLadder announced that it had been instructed by Valve to cancel the Major Regional Qualifiers (MRQs) for the Budapest Major later this year.

The announcement came just five months after the MRQs were introduced as a replacement for the RMRs. Held online in Europe, Asia-Pacific and the Americas ahead of the Austin Major, they determined the 16 teams that played in Stage 1 of the tournament.

Read more
Valve cancels MRQs ahead of Budapest Major

Valve's sudden decision caught many community members by surprise, from players and broadcast talent to org executives. The consensus seems to be that this will make life even harder for teams from the lower rungs, considering that many top-tier events don't run open qualifiers.

Complexity General Manager Graham "⁠messioso⁠" Pitt understands the thought process behind Valve's decision, but urged the developer to take a more active role and ensure the circuit is working as intended.

"Between granting unnecessary exceptions, allowing events that completely disregard the TOR and specifically granting ranked status to events that should not have it, your own negligence towards 'standardising community events' has been below the quality we would expect these past 6 months," messioso argued.

"Now you've removed all wiggle room for teams to qualify from slightly lower ranks and made it solely about the ranking, which can be abused semi-freely, are you going to finally step up and take a more active role in monitoring and maintaining the VRS ecosystem?"

Ninjas in Pyjamas' Marco "⁠Snappi⁠" Pfeiffer and FURIA's Gabriel "⁠FalleN⁠" Toledo have both described the current ecosystem as a bubble at the top, with the Danish IGL arguing that established teams cannot get replaced "unless they post egregiously bad results." Running Major qualifiers, he added, "was a way to do so."

SINNERS co-founder and advisor Moritz "Askadar" Straube described the move as a "massive deathblow to a very large chunk of the second-tier scene and below." The team's IGL, Sebastian "⁠beastik⁠" Daňo, said that the decision can be positive for the scene, as long as there are more open qualifier slots in top-tier tournaments.

Australian caster and HLTV Confirmed co-host Chad "⁠SPUNJ⁠" Burchill stressed: "Open qualifiers are mandatory for an open circuit."

Tip: Turn on cookies to see embedded tweets

Broadcast figures Alex "⁠Mauisnake⁠" Ellenberg and Jordan "⁠Elfishguy⁠" Mays pointed out that Lynn Vision and TYLOO would not have been able to play at the Austin Major if not for the MRQs.

The pair were the only teams from Asia-Pacific that made it out of Stage 1, with Lynn Vision still alive in Stage 3, where they are joining The MongolZ.

But amid all the doom and gloom, some can find a bit of a silver lining. Nicolai "⁠device⁠" Reedtz joked that the removal of Major qualifiers can play in Astralis' favor, while the Fragadelphia organizers reminded the community about their next LAN event, in Ontario.

United States Alex 'Mauisnake' Ellenberg
Alex 'Mauisnake' Ellenberg
Age:
31
Team:
No team
Rating 1.0:
0.90
Maps played:
100
KPR:
0.63
DPR:
0.72
Brazil Gabriel 'FalleN' Toledo
Gabriel 'FalleN' Toledo
Age:
34
Team:
Rating 1.0:
1.05
Maps played:
2027
KPR:
0.68
DPR:
0.61
Denmark Nicolai 'device' Reedtz
Nicolai 'device' Reedtz
Age:
29
Team:
Rating 1.0:
1.15
Maps played:
2200
KPR:
0.77
DPR:
0.62
Australia Jordan 'Elfishguy' Mays
Jordan 'Elfishguy' Mays
Age:
30
Team:
No team
Rating 1.0:
-
Maps played:
0
KPR:
-
DPR:
-
Australia Chad 'SPUNJ' Burchill
Chad 'SPUNJ' Burchill
Age:
35
Team:
No team
Rating 1.0:
0.88
Maps played:
167
KPR:
0.62
DPR:
0.73
United Kingdom Graham 'messioso' Pitt
Graham 'messioso' Pitt
Age:
33
Team:
No team
Rating 1.0:
-
Maps played:
0
KPR:
-
DPR:
-
Denmark Marco 'Snappi' Pfeiffer
Marco 'Snappi' Pfeiffer
Age:
35
Rating 1.0:
0.93
Maps played:
2069
KPR:
0.64
DPR:
0.68
Czech Republic Sebastian 'beastik' Daňo
Sebastian 'beastik' Daňo
Age:
27
Team:
Rating 1.0:
0.93
Maps played:
1716
KPR:
0.62
DPR:
0.67
#1
 | 
Russia moonEEK!
COOKING STRAIGHT SHIT 🔥🔥🔥
2025-06-11 23:01
114
3 replies
#20
 | 
Europe Squirel
imagine trying to farm HLTV '+1's lol
2025-06-11 23:31
33
2 replies
I will not be giving him a +1 , SHAME ON HLTV user moonEEK! from Ukraine fan of Spirit . Regards
2025-06-12 00:36
5
#31
 | 
Russia moonEEK!
Yes, I am farming +1. Problem chud?
2025-06-12 00:46
55
Finally
2025-06-11 23:02
4
1 reply
#63
 | 
Germany Sol1taire
This move would be like if the World Cup were only the top 32 ranked teams every year, no regional distribution based on region performance, nothing, just the top32
2025-06-12 15:18
1
#3
Faceit level 9  | 
latto | 
Poland Oerrty
Fuck Valve
2025-06-11 23:04
30
Fragadelphia is the best tweet
2025-06-11 23:05
61
3 replies
ye but advertising open slots for EU teams doesnt really help NA scene which I tought is the main goal for them
2025-06-12 00:58
0
1 reply
NA teams are going to be in constant turmoil if they are always the ones with less competition to begin with. European teams going to NA events gives the scene a chance/motivation to improve against tier 2 Eu teams which in turn can help reduce the massive gaps in team skill in NA.
2025-06-12 01:40
8
Only plus side in my opinion
2025-06-12 01:12
0
#5
Faceit level 1  | 
 | 
South America fernlsp
Huge L
2025-06-11 23:06
7
#6
cool4st | 
Mongolia 4st
bomboclat
2025-06-11 23:06
3
Astralis might make the major ¿
2025-06-11 23:06
14
huge L
2025-06-11 23:07
8
#9
Old school: User been here for more than 10 years  | 
 | 
Finland Karppanator
I feel vindicated with too many people liking the change, and the industry folk being kinda similarly aligned. That must only mean that Valve won't back down.
2025-06-11 23:10
1
1 reply
#58
Faceit level 10  | 
 | 
Ukraine Lud0_
Valve doesn't back down anyway, they are in control of decision-making process
2025-06-12 08:55
1
#10
Noppo | 
Slovakia dent0
If other tournaments will be forced to run open qualifiers than it's okay, cuz lower ranked teams have more opportunities to compete on a higher event.. but still, majors hit different so teams would need to grind that real hard to get that spot still sry if im writing like a drunk, but i am one lol Let's hope next change will be bo3 minimum on majors and bo5 gf
2025-06-11 23:10
10
1 reply
Only PGL have open qualifiers. ESL and blast only closed. And playing cct is a awful
2025-06-11 23:50
3
Will Asstralis finally make the major now??
2025-06-11 23:10
11
#12
 | 
Serbia Jnordz
Gaben delusional
2025-06-11 23:12
7
Yes, enforcing enough open qualifiers in ranked events is a must if they are going to scrap the qualifiers for the major.
2025-06-11 23:13
22
Valve what the actual fuck you are doing?
2025-06-11 23:16
10
Introducing vrs system to combat partner teams, just to introduce same partnership system for the major with 60% of spots already being gatekept by the same establishments
2025-06-11 23:18
25
If there would be no MRQs in May, then also the invite date would be the 5th of May, which means Lynn Vision would be qualified directly without going through the MRQ.
2025-06-11 23:21
1
#17
Faceit level 4  | 
Lake | 
United States SmallTinyJesus
God forbid we actually have some fun fucking matches and watch some upsets happen, and give some lesser teams some funding via sticker money.
2025-06-11 23:22
26
14 replies
#19
Faceit level 10 Old school: User been here for more than 10 years  | 
 | 
Spain Silber_
We need open qualifiers. This is bs
2025-06-11 23:28
9
13 replies
no more bo1s above all, shit goes wayyy too fast especially with mr12..
2025-06-12 00:14
3
12 replies
#28
Faceit level 4  | 
Lake | 
United States SmallTinyJesus
nah, I’m a BO1 defender, thats what really makes the major fun for me, the underdogs getting the opportunity to make some waves and upsets, which also helps than with VRS (im not gonna act like im a genius on VRS so lmk if im wrong), no one likes BO1s bc of pickems, its not fun watching whoever is “supposed” to win, win.
2025-06-12 00:29
8
11 replies
its not because of pickems its just ass also if youre gonna do bo1s you gotta commit all the way and do only that with mr15 at least but all in all it just makes majors feel very fkn illegitimate and also just too short bc no one else does it this way at ALL also upsets would still very very much be possible and also feel more legitimate and realer with more impact, just look at mibr flc and legacy faze for example plus wed also prolly have much much less of all this annoying ass "mickey mouse" talk, at least i hope if majors stay like this and dont go bo5 finals either the iems will feel much much more prestigious and the majors more and more insignificant
2025-06-12 01:08
2
9 replies
WAHH WAHHH I RATHER HAVE A COIN SITTING IN MY INVENTORY FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE FOR NO ABSOLUTE USE AT ALL INSTEAD OF ENJOYING SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL AND FUN WAHHH
2025-06-12 01:28
5
8 replies
bro i never fkn bought pickem pass ingame wtf r u guys on about i couldnt care less about that shit im talking about viewers experience fkn hard exclusively as much as anyone could
2025-06-12 01:31
1
7 replies
Yes viewers experience has been SO AWFUL AND REGRESSING mate, exactly why cs keeps growing with new players ever day, because the game is so boring to play and watch, we're so headed in the wrong direction
2025-06-12 01:36
5
6 replies
bo1 is awful thats pretty much alls im saying hence why at most yalla compass are the only monkeys alongside valve that have it implemented
2025-06-12 01:39
0
5 replies
I watch the major for upsets and something different, not for exactly what happens in the circuit year round Cheers mate no one cares for your opinion
2025-06-12 01:40
5
4 replies
clearly you do lmao also who really cares for upsets before playoffs? and why not then go all the way bo1 all throughout? also again as i said already upsets happen pretty much just as often in bo3s
2025-06-12 01:52
0
3 replies
They don't, learn a thing or two about statistics before claiming bullshit, cheers mate. If a team has a 25% chance to win a map vs a top team, their chance of winning 2 maps for example will be 0.125/1 chance, meanwhile winning a bo1 is a 0.25/1 chance Please don't spread your bullshit around Cheers again mate
2025-06-12 01:54
5
2 replies
Meatriding mr12 bo1 is crazy
2025-06-12 07:10
0
1 reply
Its a good change People have lives, those 6 rounds per game really save much more time than you think buddy We got shit to do and wanna watch cs, this shit is good, grow up kid
2025-06-12 07:50
4
#48
Old school: User been here for more than 10 years  | 
 | 
United States TacticalSanta
Bo1s are weird, they can be a toss up and throw you into whats a single elim bo3 (if you go 0-2). I think the 2nd match should probably always be bo3, but idk if valve want to switch things up like that.
2025-06-12 03:48
0
#18
 | 
Sweden Vrede
dog valve
2025-06-11 23:25
6
valve and gaben are shit
2025-06-11 23:36
5
device lmao
2025-06-11 23:40
11
Add more open qualifiers to every big tournament leading up to a Major. Problem solved.
2025-06-11 23:43
7
It is because Major gave underdogs more chances that makes it so meaningful. But now, what's the difference between it and Katowice or Cologne?
2025-06-12 00:13
2
1 reply
Cologne and katowice are for me more prestige then major ever was. No bullshit format Bo1 and no bo5 final. How can you claim major has more prestige when it's so much more easier to win it all. For me the whole format is only 2 changes away, and that is make it all bo3 and final bo5.
2025-06-12 07:05
0
#26
 | 
United States xiquo
wow
2025-06-12 00:12
0
#30
Faceit level 7  | 
GeT_RiGhT | 
United Kingdom MystJess
Another reminder valve have never made a good CS game (or anticheat), and seemingly that’s extending to their esports decision making too… Another shit decision from Valve. Seems the only thing they can do correctly is copy/ paste skins from the workshop into shitty cases to feed their underage gambling addicted playerbase. Fuck you Valve.
2025-06-12 00:36
5
astralis and blast about to cook something for their revival
2025-06-12 00:56
2
#36
Faceit level 6  | 
NiKo | 
Canada swagcrazy
device tweet is so funny sitting in the middle of all those other tweets
2025-06-12 01:20
2
BRUH
2025-06-12 01:48
0
Valve copied Riot, with only the big team can attend -> another win for superior game Valorant
2025-06-12 02:42
1
#47
rain | 
United States celtek
i actually don't hate this. if local TO's want to run more LOCAL LANs , how is that BAD? that will allow the up-and-coming teams to gain VRS points TO make the major. and if those teams don't compete in the higher prestige tournaments, guess what? they don't get THOSE vrs points -- which i would assume would be worth A LOT more than their shitty local 10k LAN? everyone is all about growing the scene except when Valve entices local TOs to host regional LANs - something that's desperately needed anyway
2025-06-12 03:42
2
2 replies
I think the problem with it is just what you just said, The higher prestige tournaments have way more VRS to give then local ones. So just by attending some higher tournament you already will have enough that a local LAN can't compete too
2025-06-12 06:58
0
The issue is that the VRS is carried by the prize money and by the team themselves. Imagine 3DMAX going to a french regional event, if they win, they earn nothing as prize pool is low and opposition is weak, but if they drop 1 match, even Bo1, against Genone for example, they would loose 10 ranks That doesn't entice teams to play those lesser tournaments, and if they don't play it, it removes the opportunity for the small teams to take down big ones and earn a lot of VRS points Imo Valve needs to impose a 50/50 VRS/Open Qualifier to all other events, so you can be sure that top teams will always have to fight against randoms.. But it's so costly to host open qualifier, and with the cheater issues, it means that only super big TO will be able to host safely, that's again almost like partnerships...
2025-06-12 08:10
0
#49
 | 
Brazil MrLucas
It would be a fair decision if VRS was functional but the reality is that it's a terrible system where there is a bubble at the top almost impenetrable and the majors were the only escape for smaller/newer orgs and teams to be able to dream with a sustainable project, now this feels like the last nail in the coffin for the tier 2/3 scene.
2025-06-12 04:58
4
Good news for Astralis,Ence,Big. Too many fans too much money
2025-06-12 05:57
2
So first Valve stops the Lourdes Agreement and whatever Blast had for payment so the tournaments would be more 'open' so their would be no abuse about it with majors. But now it's just the same again, only without the agreements, what a fucking joke this is
2025-06-12 06:17
4
#52
 | 
United States TheGr8One
valve is a garbage company. they can do whatever they want because steam maintains a pc gaming marketplace monopoly. i hope someone puts this shit company in its place
2025-06-12 06:42
4
#59
 | 
Romania nontoxic
if tier 2 teams truly deserved to go to a major they would actually win the valve ranked matches required to actually get to tier 1 if you can't get to the top 20 like everyone else did then how am I supposed to believe you deserve stickers?
2025-06-12 09:57
1
1 reply
The problem is, that there are so few spots for these kinda CCT teams. If we talk about EU, that should have 16 spots out of 32. And out of those 16, its gonna be like 11-12 teams that gain VRS points by attending the big lans. Its like a Catch 22, where the teams already high up will stay there just by the virtue of winning like 1-2 matches on a big LAN, not even making playoffs. Those wins give so much points as winning a CCT tournament or sth like that. So it practically becomes unavailable to some new teams who possibly never ever can grind enough VRS poitns to be top 16 EU. At least the MRQ has given them the possibility, eventhough I hated the fact its online. Now its gonna be as closed circuit as ever with one or two occasional new challengers appearing. Doesnt seem right to me
2025-06-12 14:18
1
#60
Faceit level 9  | 
 | 
Poland Kobel_
Unsustainable unless tier 1 TOs actually start putting way more slots up to grabs through open qualifiers
2025-06-12 10:27
0
#61
 | 
Poland Teamnexus
RIP CS, RIP Pro Scene. No underdog Storys, no upsets. Every tournament the same boring matchups.
2025-06-12 11:54
1
#64
 | 
Europe dip6o
Valve is a secret astralis shit show enjoyer confirmed
2025-06-12 19:05
0
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.

Back to comment

Now playing
Thumbnail for stream
Brazil
MADHOUSE TV
17891 viewers
Top streams
All(64)
Casters(45)
Streamers(12)
Organizers(7)
Brazil
MADHOUSE TV
(17891)
Brazil
gaules
(9964)
Other
PGL
(8165)
Brazil
gaules
(4778)
Other
Thunderpick
(3340)
Russia
Paragon
(2910)
Other
PGL 2
(2565)
Russia
watchfulTV
(2019)
Brazil
gaules
(1801)
Russia
watchfulTV B
(1445)
Argentina
forg1
(1212)
Brazil
boltz
(1099)
Russia
Paragon 3
(925)
Brazil
fer
(880)
Argentina
forg1
(877)
Russia
HappyChucky
(850)
Brazil
nak
(721)
Russia
poka
(697)
Ukraine
Maincast
(640)
Belgium
ScreaM
(588)
Poland
IzakOOO
(583)
United States
Trottah
(491)
United States
freakazoid
(479)
Russia
m4ga
(440)
Brazil
mch
(439)
United States
Stewie2k
(436)
Russia
Paragon 2
(421)
Romania
Werty
(421)
Russia
SBolt
(398)
Argentina
elmorocho7
(314)
Ukraine
Maincast 2
(273)
France
KRL
(235)
United Kingdom
ESL TV
(230)
United States
Trucklover86
(188)
Brazil
mch
(168)
Finland
pelaajat
(167)
Brazil
VitinhO
(156)
France
Croissant Strike
(146)
Mongolia
maaRaa
(139)
Brazil
kabrafps
(132)
Russia
jmqa
(128)
Brazil
XISTERA
(123)
Other
PGL
(118)
Mongolia
Zilkenberg
(107)
Brazil
coldzera
(89)
Brazil
Tris_Mara
(87)
Other
PGL 2
(69)
Russia
Paragon
(58)
Kazakhstan
Paragon
(58)
Brazil
gaules TV 2
(46)
Brazil
BTSBrasilTV
(38)
United States
Regent
(37)
Brazil
VilacaTTV
(35)
Brazil
Napa
(30)
France
KRL 2
(25)
Brazil
gaules TV
(25)
United States
Trottah
(25)
Finland
Elisa Esports
(13)
United States
iamfusiion
(12)
Ukraine
WOLF
(6)
Brazil
kabrafps
(5)
Ukraine
Maincast
(2)
Brazil
BTSBrasilFPS
(1)
Brazil
JokerBR (YouTube)
(1)